“Democrats often rail against the dangers of “hate speech” and “extremist content,” yet their radical election overhaul bill, H.R. 1, would use taxpayer funds to subsidize the very speech they claim is bigoted,” The Federalist reports.
“Defenders of H.R. 1 cynically claim the program is not at taxpayers’ expense because the money would come from new corporate financial penalties. But wherever the government gets its money from, it belongs to the public.”